WebJan 1, 2024 · This diffuser angle with a modified diffuser is said to have an optimum value compared to the other readings by reducing the drag coefficient. Fig. 7 indicates the graph of the drag coefficient for a car with a modified diffuser at 8 0, at a velocity of 40 m/s which generates the Cd value of 0.2684. WebThe drag and lift coefficients are computed at different diffuser angles to find out the optimum angle of diffuser. With the increase in diffuser angle, it is found that the total...
Design and Optimization of the Diffuser for the Formula SAE …
WebDec 7, 2015 · The answer is performance! DCG has a high level of adjustability. Like all standard adjustable round diffusers, DCG allows for a vertical adjustment of the airflow. … WebThe optimal parameters including the ratio between throat diameter and inlet diameter (k 1), the ratio between suction diameter and throat diameter (k 2), and the convergent angle (α) as well as the diffuser angle (β) were selected. Through further verification, the optimal solution performs well and has great potential to be used in ... does taro tea have caffeine
The Physics of Diffusers: How to Make a Car Really Suck
Webin designing the diffuser was to analyze the bluff body. The buff body is a blunt body whose outer dimensions are similar to the FSAE car. This helps in determining the optimum size, … WebWhen the length–diameter ratio of the mixing chamber was about 10.8–12, it was beneficial to mix uniformity, and when the expansion angle of the diffuser was 4–6°, the ejector had a better ejector efficiency. Keywords: CO 2 ejector; flow distribution; characteristic line method; distribution parameter method; structure optimization MSC: WebApr 16, 2012 · Though a 35% difference in down force data was recorded comparatively between both testing regimes (CFD and on-track testing) for the diffuser angles, the data generated from both testing setups indicate a down force improvement as the diffuser angle is increased along 9°, 14° and 20 with a lap time simulation indicating a 1.5% average lap … facial recognition mask wearing