WebFIRST DIVISION [ G.R. No. 182864, January 12, 2015 ] EASTERN SHIPPING LINES, INC., PETITIONER, VS. BPI/MS INSURANCE CORP., & MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE CO., LTD., RESPONDENTS. DECISION. PEREZ, J.: ... Both appealed to CA. In the CA, ESLI and ATI raised limited liability of US$500.00 per package as provided in Commonwealth … WebNov 5, 2014 · This is an action against defendants shipping company, arrastre operator and broker-forwarder for damages sustained by a shipment while in defendants' custody, …
Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. Vs Court of Appeals PDF - Scribd
Webc. Boundary System Magboo vs. Bernardo 7 SCRA 952 (1963) 2. Liability of Carriers for Loss, Destruction and Deterioration of Goods; Exceptions; Presumption of Negligence Articles 1734-1735; Articles 1739-1743 Eastern Shipping Lines vs. IAC, supra Ganzon vs. CA 161 SCRA 646 (1985) Eastern Shipping Lines vs. Court of Appeals 196 SCRA 570 … WebEASTERN SHIPPING LINES, INC., petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATION (POEA), MINISTER OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, HEARING OFFICER ABDUL BASAR and KATHLEEN D. SACO, ... Vitaliano Saco was Chief Officer of the M/V Eastern Polaris when he was killed in an accident in Tokyo, … dababy worth 2021
Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. CA, Gr. No. 97412, July 12, …
WebThe" first group" would consist of the cases of Reformina v. Tomol (1985), Philippine Rabbit Bus LInes v. Cruz (1986), Florendo v. Ruiz (1989) and National Power Corporation v. angas (1992). In the "second group" would be Malayan Insurance Company v. Manila Port Service (1969), Nakpil and Sons v. WebPanganiban FACTS: Private respondent Davao Pilots Association filed a complaint against petitioner Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. for sum of money, alleging that petitioner has unpaid fees for pilotage services rendered by respondent. Petitioner disputed the claims of respondent by assailing the constitutionality of Executive Order 1088, from ... WebFeb 19, 2024 · In Nacar v. Gallery Frames,[1] the Supreme Court laid down the following guidelines for the imposition and computation of legal interests. The guidelines in the Eastern Shipping Lines case[2] were accordingly modified to embody BSP MB Circular No. 799, as follows: da baby worth